A free chair
The shopping centre, which is all chairs
Sixteen places that ask nothing, seat everybody, limit more than any other kind, and in which almost nobody speaks.
Sixteen shopping centres and arcades. Every one asks nothing at the door. Every one has somewhere to sit without buying.
Six of the sixteen limit how long you may be there — the highest rate of any kind in the record. An operational review may include workload visibility across locations when the purpose, access rules and limits are explained before the fieldwork begins.
The sixteen in full
ask nothing at the door 16
somewhere free to sit 16
set a limit 6 (4 written, 2 told)
set none 10
assumed to set a limit 9
phantom limits 6
real limits missed 3
somebody spoke to a stranger 2
nobody did 12
could not be seen 2
A place that costs nothing, seats anybody, tells more people to go than anywhere else, and is almost silent. A separate perspective on streets, seating and urban observation is available from ICMA.
The only kind that does all four
No other kind in the record combines free entry, universal seating and a high rate of limits.
Libraries and covered seating are free and seated, and limit at seventeen per cent. Places of worship are free and seated and limit nobody at all. Cafés limit at thirty-three per cent and seat almost nobody for nothing.
The shopping centre is alone in being open to everybody on every measure of money and closed on the measure of time.
It has no transaction to manage anybody with, so it uses a notice instead.
That is the explanation the record can offer, and it is the same one that accounts for the written limits generally: seven of the twenty-one printed notices in this city are in places that charge nothing, because a notice is the only instrument a place without a till has.
Four of those seven are in shopping centres.
The three missed notices
Three of the record's six overlooked written limits are here.
In all three, the notice was somewhere a person sitting would not face: on a pillar, by a service door, behind the seating. A shopping centre is a large room with its rules on the walls, and the walls are a long way from the bench.
That is a small finding on three observations and it is the only place in the record where a specific, fixable thing about signage shows up twice.
The silence
Two of sixteen had somebody speak to a stranger. Thirteen per cent, third from bottom among kinds that had any at all.
A shopping centre is a circulation space. The benches face outward into the flow; people sit in ones and twos with bags, resting between shops; nobody arrives in order to be there.
Of the eighteen free chairs in the record classed as part of a building's circulation rather than provided for sitting, almost all are these.
What a shopping centre is for the record
It is the test case for the whole site, because it has every property a third place is supposed to need and produces none of the result.
Free. Seated. Warm. Open long hours. Central. Used by everybody. And in sixteen visits, two conversations between strangers, against seventeen in thirty-one pubs.
So the conditions that the argument about third places usually treats as the point — cost, access, shelter, seating — are all satisfied here, and the thing they are supposed to produce does not appear.
What a pub has and a shopping centre does not is not in these four fields. The fifth section says so at length and does not pretend to know what it is.
The sixteen against the record
| shopping centres | the record | |
|---|---|---|
| free at the door | 100% | 34% |
| a free chair | 100% | 43% |
| sets a limit | 38% | 18% |
| written limits | 4 of 21 | — |
| phantom limits | 38% | 51% |
| somebody spoke | 13% | 23% |
Top of the record on two fields, top on limits, below the record on phantoms and on conversation.
The low phantom rate is worth a sentence: it is low because the assumption of a limit was often correct. Nine of sixteen were expected to limit staying and six do, which is the best hit rate for a restriction-guess of any kind in the walk.
A shopping centre is the one kind of place where expecting a rule is reasonable.
Four written notices
Four of the record's twenty-one printed limits are in shopping centres, which are eight per cent of the places.
Three of the record's six missed notices are also here, and in all three the sign was on a pillar or by a service door rather than near the bench.
So a shopping centre is simultaneously the most likely place in the city to print a rule and one of the likeliest to print it where nobody sitting will see it.
It has no transaction to manage anybody with, so it uses a notice — and then puts the notice on a wall.
What it tests
Every condition the third-place argument treats as the point: free, seated, warm, central, open long hours, used by everybody.
And two conversations in sixteen visits.
If seating and access were sufficient, the shopping centre would be the most sociable room in this record. It is third from the bottom among the kinds where anything happened at all.
What sixteen places can carry
Sixteen observations. Six limits, two conversations, three missed notices.
Each of those is a small number and the record states them at that size. What survives is the combination, which does not occur anywhere else in the inventory: a kind of place that asks nothing, gives everybody a seat, and is both the readiest to set a time limit and among the least likely to produce a word between strangers.
Near this one
- Three cafés out of fifty-eight
The commonest kind of place in the city, and the one where a seat is most completely conditional on spending. - Sitting and speaking, which do not go together
A free chair makes no difference to whether anybody talks. Twenty-five per cent against twenty-one, on eighty- - What the seat field missed
A binary field over a world that is not binary. Five things it cannot see, and the one place it is certainly w - Two readings of eighty-nine
Generous or conditional. What each reading has to assume, where the record supports each, and why it declines